glenmontgroup

Archive for December, 2011|Monthly archive page

The Importance of IT Trainers in Law Firm Environments

In Glenmont Group Articles on December 29, 2011 at 1:39 pm

Written by Geoff Zodda, Managing Director at Glenmont Group

One of the more understated positions within a law firm tends to be the “Good Ole” IT Trainer. They do their respective jobs day in and day out, yet do not get much press for the importance they have at the firm. A decent number of users with whom the trainers work on a weekly basis do not realize what comprises a day in the life of a trainer. In between teaching classes, whether via WebEx, Classroom, or a one-on-one setting, trainers have major responsibilities that make up a far greater percentage of their workday than one would think.

It is often your IT Trainer who serves as the backup at the help desk should there be a shortage of individuals for the demand at one time. They are often tasked with developing curriculum, cheat sheets, and training manuals and materials for the firm. Trainers are heavily relied upon to research and study on a variety of software, hardware, and the latest technology trends, and to be the encyclopedia of general IT knowledge, so they can effectively engage and educate their audience.

One would struggle to count the number of different hats IT Trainers wear over the course of a single workday at the firm, let alone throughout the life of their training careers. A person with those constant and diverse responsibilities, with the personality to know how to regularly and effectively communicate with users of varying technical understanding, and who is relied upon by potentially thousands of employees to be the resident expert in an ever-changing environment like legal IT, has got to be one of the more well-regarded roles within a law firm’s IT group, right? Wrong. With all of that reliance and dependence on one role, why are IT Trainers seemingly so undervalued in law firms?

We asked trainers, users, and management to help explain how this became an unfortunate trend in the law firm industry. One explanation, which seems to be the consensus amongst the law firm community, is that since the users are so busy, and may only spend a few hours over the course of weeks or months with a particular Trainer, they may not be aware of the greater impact IT Trainers can have on a firm.

Jennifer Holehouse, Co-Founder of the Washington Trainers Forum, spoke with us about what makes Trainers so important to a law firm, commenting, “In-house law firm trainers are generally going to be able to spend time learning direct business needs and the workflow of the practice, and be able to customize learning modules to use technology to streamline and boost productivity. In contrast, out of the box training or e-learning won’t have the same positive impact on productivity – although they can be a good supplement to custom learning. The fact is most jobs will require some type of training in order for people to do the job correctly.” Bryan Gehle, Director of Applications at Howrey LLP, feels that law firms tend to misunderstand how to assign value to IT Trainers, suggesting, “Trainers don’t typically fall under IT Department/CIO cost structure. Therefore, the cost to employ Trainers that are then leveraged for IT Support seems high, unjustified or misplaced.” Understanding the flaw in this logic, Gehle counters, “Trainers are important because they typically can answer the ‘how to’ questions that get asked of [potentially higher-paid] tier 2 and tier 3 resources. However, Trainers should train tier 1/help desk support analysts or provide tier 0 [self help] documentation [that is] easily accessible by users. IT Trainers often become the ’face’ of technology. As such, they become the first point of contact for future questions/incidents, which may by-pass any tier 1/Help Desk channels that aren’t well established. When this happens, user questions [are not] captured and therefore no statistical data is available to justify their work or value to the organization.”

There are many challenges for IT Trainers in a law firm environment, but the two most common ones go hand-in-hand. First, and foremost, the users (i.e. the attorneys, litigation support staff, finance departments, etc.) are strapped for time with their day-to-day and ad hoc responsibilities, so fitting in a training class or webinar into their full, and often over-extended, schedules is not normally on the top of their priority list. Unless the firms’ leadership or departmental management mandates it, IT Trainers have to work to coordinate the varying schedules of the audience they are attempting to teach.

Once a Trainer has a captive audience, the next hurdle is helping the users to realize the short- and long-term benefits that training offers, and the impact it will have on their daily responsibilities. IT Trainers focus on educating the users, while striving to improve their understanding and comfort with the various, and always evolving, technologies utilized by a law firm. When Trainers accomplish this, workflow processes are more likely to be refined within the specific user groups, and ultimately greater efficiencies are promoted within the firm as a whole.

The reality of today’s top law firms are that they are largely driven by the technologies they employ. However, IT Trainers are only as valuable to a law firm as the value a firm places on its technology. Law firms that ignore the glaring deficit created by conducting everyday business with antiquated technologies perpetuate an industry-wide under-appreciation and place a generally misguided lack of value on how IT Trainers are integral to staying competitive. Whereas firms that have committed to keeping up with the latest trends in IT and then go acquire those technologies, typically have already consulted with their IT Trainers to verify the product’s quality and understand any of its potential short-falls prior to making that purchase, as well as to devise a plan how to rollout and implement it, and prepare how to teach the intended users to best understand and utilize that technology once it has been obtained. As firms rely on the expertise of its IT Support professionals to oversee, maintain, and protect the health of their IT infrastructure, the strength and quality of the IT Trainers directly bolsters the investment that law firms make to build that infrastructure, by teaching the firms’ users to conduct business and leverage technologies. You decide, are they worth it?

“We need a top ESI salesperson in NY, DC or San Francisco with a book of busines and cannot be a job hopper…”

In Insights on December 21, 2011 at 12:53 pm

Posted by Joe Alonzo, Director of eDiscovery/Computer Forensics at Glenmont Group

Guess what? We hear this exact line nearly everyday from the eDiscovery vendor community.  Question is, how are you going to get this person?

It doesn’t matter whether you’re a $2MM startup or a multi-billion dollar  behemoth, everyone is revenue hungry and believes they are the perfect company to work for.

Is this the person you’d like to hire?

  • Not a job hopper, only two  jobs in ten years
  • Quota beater year after year
  • President’s Club or other corporate awards
  • Proven relationships  with corporate legal departments or Partners at AM Law 100 firms
  • Excellent knowledge of the EDRM, case workflow and litigation technology
  • A subject matter expert known by others in the community
  • Fire in the belly, constant desire to win
  • JD or top University

I estimate there are ten people at most like this across the US.    Candidates like this are hesitant to leave their current situations for many reasons.  “Fear of the Unknown” often comes into play and an increase in base salary is not enough.   The truth is, you have to look at the search with an Outlier set of eyes.

Glenmont Group has been very succesful at placing some of the top and most well-known salespeople with tier 1 companies in the space.  Our work was a key factor in the sale price for the some of the most notable acquisitions over the past five years.

(I wrote a much longer piece on this, but my colleagues threatened to put my desk in the elevator if I didn’t abbreviate this blog.  Please contact me if you are interested in my insight on how to effectively get the right person onboard with your organization.   joe.alonzo@glenmontgroup.com OR 973-746-0600  x 109)

Happy Holidays!!!

Trendspotting — Food Trucks and Discovery

In Insights, Outside Articles on December 15, 2011 at 1:39 pm
Posted by Dana Fink, Director of Staffing

Two years ago Michael Potters, CEO of the Glenmont Group, ran into the office gushing with enthusiasm. “I just saw the coolest thing, a food truck selling gourmet Cuban food in Montclair! This is the future of food!”. As professional recruiters, we are always looking to be ahead of the hiring curves and to recognize trends.

We go from this…

Roach Coach

To this …

French Quarter food truck in Montclair, NJ

To this….

Rocco DiSpirito -famous restaurateur

Kate Potters, COO of The Glenmont Group, Shannon Potters, And Rocco in NYC

Trends in the discovery process are evolving as well. Where email was the driving force of discovery years ago – the trend is now moving away from this medium. This article delves into the changes in the discovey process today http://bit.ly/q7TVS0. Being in the know of the latest trends keeps the competitiive advantage on your side.

Get this in before the new year begins

In Uncategorized on December 14, 2011 at 2:29 pm

Posted by Geoff Zodda, Managing Director, IT Staffing Services

 Can’t believe it’s almost 2012. Where did 2011 go? With that being said; One piece of advice for all candidates that are looking back at the year that was and the twelve months ahead; If you get a call from a recruiter who thinks of you for a position that you have an interest in, do not pass up on it for the mere fact that you aren’t in the market. Exploring positions to see if it would be a better opportunity than what you have now is a commonplace and a moral dilemma for many individuals. While you may not want to use up vacation days that may roll over or days in Q1 of 2012,  an interview for a passive candidate is a no-pressure way to compare apples to apples and a great way to get a new position without actually looking. 

How Sound Leadership Does Not a Good Company Make

In Insights on December 12, 2011 at 12:39 pm

Posted by Adam Weissman, Director, IT and Legal Technology at Glenmont Group

For many fans of Major League Baseball, as I am, the regular season can offer as much excitement and competitive spirit as it does frustration and disheartening deflation. These emotions can be felt by the same individual in the same season. Those of us whose favorite team has caused the latter of that emotional spectrum, we take solace in the misguided phrase of hope, “There’s always next year.”

Shortly after the World Series champion has been crowned, baseball’s “second season” begins. This is when Free Agency signings and player trades occur, and where players of all talent levels, positions, and price tags are considered by team executives and are signed to contracts for the upcoming season. These signings and trades can very quickly turn a fan’s disgust of the prior season’s results, into renewed hope and anticipation for the upcoming season. Or, if you are a NY Mets fan, like me, it reaffirms the widespread, growing sentiment that the team’s ownership does not understand the basic fundamentals of how to construct a competitive club.

Since August, the Mets have lost the bulk of its offensive stars via trades or free agency signings, but they have been pro-active to sign and trade for good, seasoned relief pitchers. Unfortunately, as it stands now, the Mets’ starting pitching rotation has more questions than the Riddler, and their current offensive lineup is practically devoid of veteran presence, appreciable prowess, or depth. This would be akin to the Partners of a top Litigation Defense Firm hiring 50 new Litigation Attorneys, but simultaneously laying off its entire Litigation Support staff, along with the majority of its most experienced IT professionals, in advance of starting a $100 million litigation matter. (The Mets’ payroll is expected to be $100 million for the 2012 Season, which is Top 10 amongst the other 29 Teams).

In other words, a baseball team cannot win if its offense cannot score runs and its starting pitchers cannot prevent the opposition from scoring runs. Therefore, a formidable corps of relief pitchers may never get the opportunity to help the team win. Similarly, a law firm cannot be competitive if its in-house Litigation Support group cannot process documents and information, and its IT staff is incapable of fully supporting the related technologies that the firm uses. Furthermore, a vaunted stable of Litigation Defense attorneys will never be in a position to successfully defend their clients.

“That’s the Way We Always Did It”

In Guest Blog on December 8, 2011 at 5:57 pm

A few weeks ago while down at Georgetown Michael Potters was sitting with a friend of his, Dan Regard, Founder and MD of Intelligent Discovery Solutions.

He shared a story that Michael found so profound he asked Dan if he wanted to Guest Blog on eDiscovering. Dan being the smart marketeer that we all know him for, of course, approved.

So here is Dan’s guest blog:

Does the statement, “We’ve always done it that way” ring any bells… ?

The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That’s an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used?

Because that’s the way they built them in England, and English expatriates built the US Railroads. Why did the English build them like that?

Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that’s the gauge they used. Why did “they” use that gauge then?

Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing. Okay! Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing?

Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England, because that’s the spacing of the wheel ruts. So who built those old rutted roads?

Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (and England) for their legions. The roads have been used ever since. And the ruts in the roads?

Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. The United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. And bureaucracies live forever. So the next time you are handed a specification and wonder what horse’s ass came up with it, you may be exactly right, because the Imperial Roman war chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the back ends of two war horses. Now the twist to the story…

When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory at Utah. The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains. The SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses’ behinds.

So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably the world’s most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse’s ass. … and you thought being a HORSE’S ASS wasn’t important!

If you would like to thank Dan for his profound blog, you can email him at dregard@iDiscoverySolutions.com.  Thank you, Dan, for your contribution.

Networking and Being Memorable

In Uncategorized on December 7, 2011 at 1:22 pm

Posted by Adam Malanaphy Project Coordinator, at Glenmont Group

Net·work·ing -a supportive system of sharing information and services among individuals and groups having a common interest. (dictionary.com)

Networking is one of the primary forces contributing to the social media movement which has emerged over the course of this last decade. As one participates in these (predominantly) online communities they are granted direct access to the forefront of a given area of interest. Given the potential that coincides with this system, it becomes obvious that in order to maximize this potential one must seize the opportunity to make a lasting impact on their colleagues. In other words, to be memorable.

Taking the opportunity to visualize oneself as a “brand” is instrumental to the process of becoming more memorable. There is no universal formula that will enable one to market oneself effectively, but playing to your strengths is a good place to start. One useful technique is to make a list of the characteristics that you are most passionate about communicating to your peers and actively focusing on this during the networking process. As one implements the concept of treating themselves as a brand, differentiation occurs. Differentiation will separate you from the pack and contribute toward marketing yourself as a specialist within your area of expertise. This concept has a snowball effect because as others begin to recognize you as a specialist they will think of you every time that your specialty is discussed and more importantly it will trigger a reaction, (and hopefully a business proposition!)

In conclusion, as your colleagues begin to know you, and where you can contribute to their organization, the chance of you becoming more memorable is increased exponentially. Taking some effort to look inward through the lense of an advertising guru will increase return on networking efforts and ultimately make you more memorable!

Great jobs numbers reported for the month of November

In Uncategorized on December 6, 2011 at 6:52 pm

There was very promising news about jobs and the unemployment numbers on Friday. To be honest, I am so busy focusing on the day-to-day that I don’t spend much time watching the news but this story caught my attention. Unemployment is down to 8.6% which is the lowest since March of 2009 and the number of new jobs increased by 120,000, way ahead of expectations. That’s not good news, that’s great news! We have been placing professionals at a steady pace all year but our placements hit a high note in October and November. I came across an anaysis on cnbc that offers some additional insights. Take a look http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000060345

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 537 other followers